2016年6月25日雅思寫作真題回憶與解析分享給考生朋友們，每一次的考題回顧對于考生的備考都是非常有幫助的，希望大家多多參考。下面，就一起來看一下。
  TASK 1
  題目：

  The average number of hours of teaching by each teacher in different type of school in four countries in 2001.

  分析：
  本次考題是一個純靜態的圖形，也就是說考生只需要對數據進行簡單的比較。
  參考范文：
  As is demonstrated in this bar chart, there are some similarities and differences in the teaching time spent by 3 kinds of teachers in 4 countries.
  Teachers in upper secondary school were occupied the most time in Japan, Spain, Iceland and the USA. In particular, there was approximately 1100 hours’ working time for teachers in the USA. However, these figures for those in other 3 countries stood at 800 hours on average.
  By contrast, teachers in primary school generally worked a lower number of hours with 1000 hours in the USA and around 600 hours in other areas. Lower secondary school is seen from the chart to maintain a middle position in this list.
  In Iceland, teachers of all kinds experienced a nearly equal number of hours educating, in comparison to Spain and the USA where primary and lower secondary schools arranged similar working time for educators.
  Overall, USA dominates others in total teaching time in these 4 countries substantially.
  (160 words)
  TASK 2
  題目類別：
  科技類
  提問方式：
  雙邊討論類
  考試題目：
  The range and quality of food has been improved with the development of technology and scientific advance. Some people think it is good and others think it is harmful. Discuss two sides and give your opinion.
  簡單分析：
  這是一篇論述類的題目，烤鴨們要分別論證經過科技改良食物的優點和缺點，并且表明自己的立場。這個題目有一點的難度，因為科技是比較小眾的雅思話題，也提醒各位烤鴨要注意復習的全面性，不能有僥幸的心理。
  Word count： 299
  Technology, the mighty force which is created by the comparatively smaller, walnut-shaped human brain, has changed the landscape, redefined the natural resources and even diversified the food we human beings rely on. The opponents and the proponents both hold their own justifications and I deem that there is no black-or-white conclusion of this issue.
  It is more likely that food shortage will undermine the wellbeing of masses less frequently if technology and scientific breakthrough improve the quality and range of choices. In the past when we human beings relied heavily on the rather limited sources of food, a spell of abnormal weather can pose a threat to the yield of the crops and the health condition of livestock, let alone the unpredicted climate change. However, the miserable past is no longer the case today. People are less prone to the impact of scarcity of the food supply and the quality as more food sources can be utilized with the advancement of science.
  On the other hand, the skeptics think technology a two-edged sword and the potential risks of technologically-modified food can never be underestimated. The security of some food generated by technology has not been identified, thereby entailing some unpredictable consequences. The genetically modified food, a milestone inhuman history, provides more options of food and enhances the quality on the one hand, also induces the doubts on its potential harm to human body and health.
  Personally, I suppose a reconciliation should be achieved between this two statements. What really matters on this issue is how properly the technologically- changed food can function in the society and what the following steps we shall take if some dire consequences arise. After all, it is the tiny brain that has the final say instead of the technology it creates.